Monday, June 29, 2009

誰較靚?

有相為証!


我諗大家嘅結果,多數都同我一樣~

第一張。

唔係話舊嘅先一定好,事實真係唔單只新不如舊,簡直不知所謂!

建築物起得冇品味,庸俗唔講嘞,剩係睇吓座太平山,啲大而肉酸嘅大廈將佢嘅 Skyline 徹底破壞,毀咗容嘅香港,仲會靚得去邊?!

19 comments:

  1. 你是否寫錯了?應該no1 較靚吧。

    ReplyDelete
  2. 係喎! 改番先! 唔該 Uncle! ^^

    ReplyDelete
  3. cool, i like the 1st pic. green mountains & some nice bildings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have no problem with the HK skyline (which I adored) until that IFC thing came along, which frankly look like a giant penis to me.
    Totally ruined the view from now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mich: 正確!

    Anonymous: Hihi! 歡迎! :)

    IFC 2期簡直勁肉酸核突! 好心啲大地產商有啲品味好唔好?!????!!!!??!?!?!

    新鮮兄: 香港, 越嚟越冇性格喇!

    ReplyDelete
  6. 那勁高的大廈是ifc2
    好肉酸呀!
    而且庶晒太平山從風水來說好像一枝針插係心藏咁

    bb

    ReplyDelete
  7. 遲 oD斜對面嘅 ICC 起好之後, 聽講, 將會改變晒成個香港嘅風水!

    ReplyDelete
  8. 以前有個朋友,幾年前去過上海後,話論夜景還是香港美。我未去過上海,問曰:何解?佢話香港背後有個山襯住,所以好好多。觀乎現在一條一條「震震棒」(我一直都覺得IFC好似果D東洋人類生態行為藝術電影的常用道具──「子子聲」震棒)檔晒,自然差得遠啦!

    ReplyDelete
  9. 香港最多的就是樓LOR﹐ 周圍都是樓和人!!
    快透不過氣。。。

    ReplyDelete
  10. 樂遊兄: 人哋外人都咁識欣賞, 反而自己人呢, 就去破壞! 唉.....

    BlingBling: 本嚟都冇所謂嘅, 但而家加埋越嚟越冇創作自由, 同禁呢樣禁嗰樣, 就真係頂唔順嘞!

    ReplyDelete
  11. 好正喎...張相你邊度搵返黎架?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hello! s-pig, 好耐冇見!

    係呀! 最正係同一角度, 同一背景 (最絕係有隻船!) 比較!

    係之前, 唔記得邊一個論壇入面下載落嚟 ga.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 死啦!我都覺得舊的一張順眼得多,新的真有點俗氣呀!

    ReplyDelete
  14. 張相幾多年前架? 唉.... 真係心都"up"晒... 座山咁靚, 破壞晒呀.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "張相幾多年前架?"

    應該係七十年代至八十年代初!

    "唉.... 真係心都"up"晒... 座山咁靚, 破壞晒呀."

    唉, 簡直天罪!

    ReplyDelete
  16. IFC has phase 2 ?? I didn't know that.

    When was it built?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi! Long time no see you! :)

    Opening~ 2003.

    ReplyDelete